Candidate sourcing and engagement software for recruiters. Scored on six weighted criteria following the HRCritic methodology.
SWOT analysis
Strengths
- Covers the essentials most teams need without standing out anywhere
- Candidate sourcing and engagement software for recruiters
- Boolean and semantic search that handles complex role requirements
- Team-wide activity history so outreach isn't duplicated
Weaknesses
- Noticeable friction in setup, admin controls or day-to-day use
- Export limits and credits complicate large campaigns
- Contact data accuracy varies by region and role
Opportunities
- Two-way sync with every major ATS
- Diversity sourcing insights
Threats
- Candidate fatigue from automated outreach
- Data-privacy rules limiting profile scraping
How the rating was calculated
| Criterion | Weight | Score | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core functionality | 30% | 63 | 18.9 |
| Ease of use | 20% | 62 | 12.4 |
| Reliability & performance | 15% | 58 | 8.7 |
| Support quality | 15% | 55 | 8.3 |
| Integrations | 10% | 61 | 6.1 |
| Value for money | 10% | 54 | 5.4 |
| Final score | 60 / 100 |
Entelo scored 60/100, placing it in the Average band (60–74). Its strongest area was core functionality (63), while value for money (54) held the score back. Strengths and weaknesses above map to those weighted criteria; opportunities and threats cover the market factors around the product — regulation, data quality, vendor consolidation and buying behaviour — that we watch when scores are next reviewed.
See what each band means on the rating levels page.