Performance reviews, goals and engagement surveys. Scored on six weighted criteria following the HRCritic methodology.
SWOT analysis
Strengths
- Top-tier across core functionality, ease of use and support — the criteria that carry the most weight
- Performance reviews, goals and engagement surveys
- Calibration sessions that keep ratings comparable across teams
- Templates that make a first cycle quick to launch
Weaknesses
- No material weakness found; remaining gaps are plan-specific or configuration-dependent
- Feedback history is hard to export for reviews outside the tool
- Heavy configuration for complex review models
Opportunities
- Skills and career-path mapping
- Tighter links with HRIS and compensation
Threats
- Survey fatigue among employees
- HR suites adding 'good enough' review modules
How the rating was calculated
| Criterion | Weight | Score | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core functionality | 30% | 88 | 26.4 |
| Ease of use | 20% | 88 | 17.6 |
| Reliability & performance | 15% | 90 | 13.5 |
| Support quality | 15% | 93 | 14 |
| Integrations | 10% | 87 | 8.7 |
| Value for money | 10% | 95 | 9.5 |
| Final score | 90 / 100 |
Lattice scored 90/100, placing it in the Exceptional band (90–100). Its strongest area was value for money (95), while integrations (87) held the score back. Strengths and weaknesses above map to those weighted criteria; opportunities and threats cover the market factors around the product — regulation, data quality, vendor consolidation and buying behaviour — that we watch when scores are next reviewed.
See what each band means on the rating levels page.