EOR for hiring and paying remote teams in emerging markets. Scored on six weighted criteria following the HRCritic methodology.
SWOT analysis
Strengths
- Covers the essentials most teams need without standing out anywhere
- EOR for hiring and paying remote teams in emerging markets
- Structured offer and onboarding handoff once a hire is made
- Clear pipeline views that keep every candidate's stage visible
Weaknesses
- Noticeable friction in setup, admin controls or day-to-day use
- Reporting needs extra setup before it answers leadership questions
- Advanced automation sits behind higher plan tiers
Opportunities
- Deeper links into HRIS and onboarding tools
- Better candidate experience on mobile
Threats
- Price pressure from all-in-one HR suites
- Crowded market with frequent feature catch-up from rivals
How the rating was calculated
| Criterion | Weight | Score | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core functionality | 30% | 64 | 19.2 |
| Ease of use | 20% | 71 | 14.2 |
| Reliability & performance | 15% | 65 | 9.8 |
| Support quality | 15% | 69 | 10.4 |
| Integrations | 10% | 69 | 6.9 |
| Value for money | 10% | 69 | 6.9 |
| Final score | 67 / 100 |
Skuad scored 67/100, placing it in the Average band (60–74). Its strongest area was ease of use (71), while core functionality (64) held the score back. Strengths and weaknesses above map to those weighted criteria; opportunities and threats cover the market factors around the product — regulation, data quality, vendor consolidation and buying behaviour — that we watch when scores are next reviewed.
See what each band means on the rating levels page.