Screening focused on gig and hourly workforces. Scored on six weighted criteria following the HRCritic methodology.
SWOT analysis
Strengths
- Handles basic scenarios at a low entry cost
- Screening focused on gig and hourly workforces
- Fast turnaround on common criminal and identity checks
- Candidate-friendly consent and status flows
Weaknesses
- Repeated reliability, data-quality or usability issues across several criteria
- International checks cost noticeably more
- Package pricing is not always transparent
Opportunities
- Continuous monitoring for existing staff
- More international coverage
Threats
- Accuracy disputes that harm trust
- Data-breach risk for sensitive records
How the rating was calculated
| Criterion | Weight | Score | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core functionality | 30% | 50 | 15 |
| Ease of use | 20% | 55 | 11 |
| Reliability & performance | 15% | 50 | 7.5 |
| Support quality | 15% | 49 | 7.4 |
| Integrations | 10% | 52 | 5.2 |
| Value for money | 10% | 50 | 5 |
| Final score | 51 / 100 |
Turn scored 51/100, placing it in the Below Average band (40–59). Its strongest area was ease of use (55), while support quality (49) held the score back. Strengths and weaknesses above map to those weighted criteria; opportunities and threats cover the market factors around the product — regulation, data quality, vendor consolidation and buying behaviour — that we watch when scores are next reviewed.
See what each band means on the rating levels page.