Criminal background checks with tuned data sources. Scored on six weighted criteria following the HRCritic methodology.
SWOT analysis
Strengths
- Covers the essentials most teams need without standing out anywhere
- Criminal background checks with tuned data sources
- Clear audit records for each completed report
- Configurable packages by role and risk level
Weaknesses
- Noticeable friction in setup, admin controls or day-to-day use
- Older dashboards make bulk uploads clunky
- County-level searches can still cause delays
Opportunities
- Continuous monitoring for existing staff
- More international coverage
Threats
- Accuracy disputes that harm trust
- Data-breach risk for sensitive records
How the rating was calculated
| Criterion | Weight | Score | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core functionality | 30% | 61 | 18.3 |
| Ease of use | 20% | 58 | 11.6 |
| Reliability & performance | 15% | 59 | 8.9 |
| Support quality | 15% | 61 | 9.2 |
| Integrations | 10% | 63 | 6.3 |
| Value for money | 10% | 61 | 6.1 |
| Final score | 60 / 100 |
Asurint scored 60/100, placing it in the Average band (60–74). Its strongest area was integrations (63), while ease of use (58) held the score back. Strengths and weaknesses above map to those weighted criteria; opportunities and threats cover the market factors around the product — regulation, data quality, vendor consolidation and buying behaviour — that we watch when scores are next reviewed.
See what each band means on the rating levels page.