Background screening for mid-market and enterprise. Scored on six weighted criteria following the HRCritic methodology.
SWOT analysis
Strengths
- Covers the essentials most teams need without standing out anywhere
- Background screening for mid-market and enterprise
- Configurable packages by role and risk level
- Fast turnaround on common criminal and identity checks
Weaknesses
- Noticeable friction in setup, admin controls or day-to-day use
- County-level searches can still cause delays
- International checks cost noticeably more
Opportunities
- Continuous monitoring for existing staff
- More international coverage
Threats
- Accuracy disputes that harm trust
- Data-breach risk for sensitive records
How the rating was calculated
| Criterion | Weight | Score | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core functionality | 30% | 56 | 16.8 |
| Ease of use | 20% | 60 | 12 |
| Reliability & performance | 15% | 65 | 9.8 |
| Support quality | 15% | 60 | 9 |
| Integrations | 10% | 65 | 6.5 |
| Value for money | 10% | 60 | 6 |
| Final score | 60 / 100 |
Accurate Background scored 60/100, placing it in the Average band (60–74). Its strongest area was reliability & performance (65), while core functionality (56) held the score back. Strengths and weaknesses above map to those weighted criteria; opportunities and threats cover the market factors around the product — regulation, data quality, vendor consolidation and buying behaviour — that we watch when scores are next reviewed.
See what each band means on the rating levels page.